The UN, in its implementation of A4P+, must address the heavily masculine, exclusionary, and militarized structures which often preclude women (and anyone outside of a very particular gendered profile) from deploying.
Tag: women peace and security
-
-
While briefing the Security Council has always been a male-dominated affair, more women have been included over the years, a development which came at the same time as an overall increase in the number of briefers.
-
The proliferation of weapons and ammunition presents a major obstacle in the implementation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda.
-
Where implemented within UN peacekeeping, the concept and practice of “gender-responsive leadership” has the potential to be transformative.
-
Access to services and supports for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence is becoming more constrained in a growing number of situations across the world.
-
Reforming peacekeeping to foster sustainable peace must include an interrogation of militarized masculinities and their harmful gendered consequences.
-
The prevention pillar of the WPS agenda focuses on preventing the root causes of war and violence. Efforts being made under the protection and participation pillars can fundamentally contradict the prevention pillar. Nowhere is this more visible than in Afghanistan.
-
Despite occurring in the same contexts, sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) and conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) have largely remained theoretically and practically separated. This obscures the overlap between SEA and CRSV and denies survivors of SEA pathways to justice, including through post-conflict transitional justice mechanisms.
-
In this first interview since being appointed president and CEO of the International Peace Institute (IPI) in March 2020, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein shares his views on the Women, Peace and Security agenda and the role of the United Nations.
-
How the ten elected members of the Security Council act, and the issues they raise, can have a lasting effect.
