If the opportunity to secure progressive gender equality measures is not seized, existing achievements will most likely be lost.
Tag: women peace and security
-
-
It is important to consider what is at stake if the status of women in Afghanistan is not clarified during peace negotiations.
-
Although a buzzword, the term “women’s issues” is regularly used without precise definition, and often has slighting, divisive undertones.
-
Gender equality is a universal agenda and its absence has profound consequences for all of humanity. There is perhaps no area where this becomes clearer than in relation to matters of peace and security.
-
In the lead up to the 20th anniversary of UN Security Council resolution 1325, perhaps one of the boldest steps the global community can make is to truly upend how it approaches peace: to move away from ideas of merely including women in broken processes, and to move towards creating necessary systemic changes, built on and unleashing women’s leadership.
-
A number of developments have emerged over the past few years indicating that the WPS agenda is under stress, if not in peril.
-
There are often an array of questions expressed that in some way relate to the fundamental question: “why women?”
-
The ambitious “Women, Peace, and Security Index” (WPS Index) makes up for the omission of gender inequality measures in conflict monitoring frameworks, state fragility analyses, political instability estimates, and various indicators from leading think tanks.
-
Charo Mina-Rojas of Black Communities’ Process (Proceso de Comunidades Negras-PCN) in Colombia discusses the peace process, the role of governments in protecting minorities, and the importance of including gender and ethnic perspectives in sustaining peace.
-
Member states and the UN should not wait for further reforms to improve gender expertise in conflict: necessary action can be taken now, in each mission, if the political will is forthcoming.
